Legal Opinion

Fox v. Aubel-Scott-Kitzmiller Co.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided December 18, 1922No. 123PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

»HOUGH, Circuit Judge

(after stating the facts as above). [1] The procedure below was indefensible. The proper referee instituted a proceeding which on its face was plainly within the jurisdiction of the court and of himself as an officer thereof. That jurisdiction was challenged without even responding to the. referee’s process, and by means of an order to show cause issued by the judge in charge of the bankruptcy court.

This method of defense is in itself undesirable because it converts what ought to be an orderly trial into a conflict of affidavits usually (as in this case) largely…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Babbitt v. DutcherSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  2. Clarke v. LarremoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
  3. Clarke v. LarremoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  4. In re KelloggCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1903
  5. In re RansfordCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1912

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Taubel-Scott-Kitzmiller Co. v. FoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  2. In Re LindsayDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1935
  3. Taubel-Scott-Kitzmiller Co. v. FoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  4. In re JonesDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 1930
  5. Irby v. CoreyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1938

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API