Casey v. Oakes
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from Superior Court, Spokane County. — Hon. W. J. G. Waxefieud, Judge pro tem. Opinion on re-hearing, the original opinion reversing ' the cause being found in 15 Wash. 450.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Reavis, J.
This cause was heard last November and reversed and remanded for a new trial. It is reported in 15 Wash. 450 (48 Pac. 53). In due time counsel for respondent presented a petition for re-hearing, which was by direction of this court answered by appellants, and the cause then was reassigned for argument. The action was instituted by respondent in the superior court of Spokane county against the Northern Pacific Railroad Company, a corporation, and Rouse, Payne and Oakes, receivers of said corporation, and A. H. Simmons, an agent of the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Scott v. Rainier Power & Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1895
- Casey v. Northern Pacific RailroadWashington Supreme Court · 1896
3Cited by4 opinions
- Schmelling v. HoffmanWashington Supreme Court · 1920
- Murphy v. PattersonMontana Supreme Court · 1901
- Pacific Northwest Pipeline Corp. v. Acres, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1957
- State v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1913