Gerald Martin v. Pacific Parking Systems Inc
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM **
Plaintiff Gerald Martin appeals from the district court’s order denying his motion for class certification. Rowden v. Pac. Parking Sys., Inc., 282 F.R.D. 581, 585 (C.D.Cal.2012). 1 The district court denied the motion, in part, because the proposed class was not ascertainable. Id. We hold that the district court did not abuse its discretion in this respect and affirm.
At oral argument on appeal, Martins counsel stated that, since the class definition refers to a “person’s” card, the proposed class excludes all individuals who used a business credit card to purchase parking. 2 The…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Pierce v. County of OrangeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Rowden v. Pacific Parking Systems, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2012
3Cited by5 opinions
- Lilly v. Jamba Juice Co.District Court, N.D. California · 2014
- Senne v. Kansas City Royals Baseball Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 2016
- Moore v. Ulta Salon, Cosmetics & Fragrance, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2015
- Kosta v. Del Monte Foods, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2015
- Alfred v. Pepperidge Farm, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2017