Legal Opinion
(PC) Belmonte v. Palomares
District Court, E.D. California
Decided October 2, 2020No. 2:19-cv-00163Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MIGUEL BELMONTE, No. 2:19-cv-00163-TLN-CKD 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 S. PALOMARES, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights 18 action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This proceeding was referred to this court by Local 19 Rule 302 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). The court will proceed to screen plaintiff’s third 20 amended complaint filed on April 30, 2020. ECF No. 36. 21 I. Screening Requirement 22 The court is…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Ivey v. Board of Regents of University of AlaskaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
- Harry Franklin v. Ms. Murphy and Hoyt CuppCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Bartlett v. StricklandSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Johnson v. DuffyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.