Legal Opinion

Schmidt-Hitchcock Contractors v. Dunning

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided June 16, 1931No. Civil No. 2933PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcALISTER, C. J.

This is an action by Schmidt-Hitchcock Contractors, a corporation, against Charles H. Dunning in which it seeks to recover $1,180 as rental for an Ingersoll-Rand portable compressor and $1,000 as damages for injuries thereto as a result of defendant’s alleged failure to take proper care of it while in his possession. From a judgment in its favor for $399.51 rendered upon the verdict of a jury the plaintiff appeals.

It appears from the complaint that the defendant hired the compressor from the plaintiff for the period, April 30, 1927, to November 27, 1928; that he promised to pay therefor $150…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Builders' Brick & Supply Co. v. Walsh Transportation Co.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1919
  2. Peterson v. Jahn Contracting Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Ward v. BruceCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927
  4. German-American Bank of Seattle v. NormileWashington Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Garrettson & Co. v. Rinehart & Dennis Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1915

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. E. P. Hinkel & Company, Inc. v. The Manhattan CompanyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1974
  2. Electrical Advertising, Inc. v. SakatoArizona Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Marcos v. Texas Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Marcos v. Texas Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API