Schmidt-Hitchcock Contractors v. Dunning
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMcALISTER, C. J.
This is an action by Schmidt-Hitchcock Contractors, a corporation, against Charles H. Dunning in which it seeks to recover $1,180 as rental for an Ingersoll-Rand portable compressor and $1,000 as damages for injuries thereto as a result of defendant’s alleged failure to take proper care of it while in his possession. From a judgment in its favor for $399.51 rendered upon the verdict of a jury the plaintiff appeals.
It appears from the complaint that the defendant hired the compressor from the plaintiff for the period, April 30, 1927, to November 27, 1928; that he promised to pay therefor $150…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Builders' Brick & Supply Co. v. Walsh Transportation Co.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1919
- Peterson v. Jahn Contracting Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1917
- Ward v. BruceCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927
- German-American Bank of Seattle v. NormileWashington Supreme Court · 1914
- Garrettson & Co. v. Rinehart & Dennis Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1915
3Cited by4 opinions
- E. P. Hinkel & Company, Inc. v. The Manhattan CompanyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1974
- Electrical Advertising, Inc. v. SakatoArizona Supreme Court · 1963
- Marcos v. Texas Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1952
- Marcos v. Texas Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1952