Legal Opinion
Olin Corp. v. Railroad Com'n of Texas
Texas Supreme Court
Decided November 13, 1985No. C-4222PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Per curiam
The application for writ of error is refused with the notation, “Refused, No Reversible Error.”
We approve only the result reached by the court of appeals, 690 S.W.2d 628, which requires Olin Corporation and Tenexplo to pay for the plugging of the well. See Tex.Nat.Res.Code Ann. §§ 89.002(a)(3) and 89.042(b) (Vernon Supp.1985).
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Railroad Commission of Texas v. Olin Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1985
3Cited by4 opinions
- Sisters of Charity of the Incarnate Word v. DunsmoorCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1992
- In Re BrothersUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Texas · 1988
- Boldrick v. BTA Oil Producers, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2007
- Sisters of Charity of the Incarnate Word v. Orlia Charles Dunsmoor and Janice Dunsmoor, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1992