Legal Opinion

Gray v. State Farm Auto Insurance

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided July 28, 1997No. 2705PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HEARN, Judge.

In these consolidated appeals, chiropractors William Gray and Robin Ivey appeal from the trial judge’s grant of summary judgment in favor of State Farm Auto Insurance Company and his dismissal of their causes of action against Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6), SCRP. We affirm.

FACTS

The facts are undisputed. 1 Appellants obtained written agreements from several of their patients purporting to assign insurance benefits to them as payment for services rendered. Appellants’ patients had previously been involved in automobile accidents with third parties…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. C.A.N. Enterprises, Inc. v. South Carolina Health & Human Services Finance CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1988
  2. Cafe Associates, Ltd. v. GerngrossSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
  3. Sphere Drake Insurance v. LitchfieldCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1993
  4. Santiago v. Safeway InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1990
  5. Marvin v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1995

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Flateau v. HarrelsonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2003
  2. Dorman v. Allstate InsuranceCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1998
  3. Ashley River Properties I, LLC v. Ashley River Properties II, LLCCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2007
  4. Trancik v. USAA InsuranceCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2003
  5. Republic Leasing Co., Inc. v. HaywoodCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1998

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API