In Re Grand Jury 89-2
District Court, E.D. Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ELLIS, District Judge.
This matter came before the Court on the motion of William Love, joined by Choice Supply, Inc. and Penguin Feathers, Inc., to compel the United States to present certain alleged exculpatory evidence to the grand jury. Specifically, movants argued that their rights under the Fifth and Sixth Amendments of the Constitution would be infringed unless the government submitted to the grand jury a thirty-six page United States International Trade Commission Report (“ITC Report”) 1 on the effectiveness of the Mail Order Drug Paraphernalia Control Act, 21 U.S.C.…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- United States v. CalandraSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Stirone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Costello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- United States v. DyerDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1990
- Ahlers v. SchebilDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1997