Legal Opinion
Johnson v. Carroll
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided March 14, 2003No. CIV.A.02-562-JJFPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
FARNAN, District Judge.
Presently before the Court is a Petition Under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 for Writ of Habe-as Corpus by a Person in State Custody (D.I.1) filed by Petitioner Ronald N. Johnson. For the reasons set forth below, Petitioner’s Section 2254 Petition will be granted to the extent that he challenges the trial judge’s failure to recuse himself. The Court will grant the Writ of Habeas Corpus sought by Petitioner, unless he is given a new sentencing.
BACKGROUND
Petitioner was indicted in the Delaware Superior Court on charges of theft of property valued in excess of $1,000,…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Schlup v. DeloSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- O'Sullivan v. BoerckelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Liteky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Ronald N. Johnson v. Thomas J. Carroll, Warden Attorney General of the State of Delaware Thomas CarrollCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
- Johnson v. CarrollCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004