Legal Opinion
Jordan v. Hall-Miller Drilling Co.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided April 13, 1953No. 4549PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HUXMAN, Circuit Judge.
This was an action filed by the Continental Supply Company against A. R. Jordan and Hall-Miller Drilling- Company, a co-partnership composed of- F. C. Hall and Joe J. Miller, to recover the balance due on an oil rotary drilling rig. It was stipulated and agreed that Continental was entitled to judgment against either Jordan or Hall-Miller Drilling Company. The only question in the case was which of them was liable for the balance due. • Trial was had to the court. It made findings of fact and conclusions of law, finding Jordan liable. He has appealed from a judgment…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Bass Furn. & Carpet Co. v. FinleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
- Schuman v. McLainSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
- Oklahoma Gas & Electric Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
3Cited by12 opinions
- Sanders v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1955
- Citicorp Leasing, Inc. v. Allied Institutional Distributors, Inc.District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1977
- Liberty National Bank & Trust Co. v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1955
- Leo Sanders and Jessie H. Sanders v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Leo Sanders v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Jessie H. Sanders v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, T. Coleman Andrews, Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Arthur L. Fleming, District Commissioner of Internal Revenue for Oklahoma and Texas, and Earl R. Wiseman, Director of Internal Revenue at Oklahoma City, Oklahoma v. Leo Sanders and Jessie H. Sanders, (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1955
- Vails v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1980
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.