Legal Opinion
Possessky v. National Flood Insurers Ass'n
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided February 18, 1981No. Civ. A. 80-2248PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DEBEVOISE, District Judge.
Plaintiffs Phillip and Helen Possessky brought suit in state court against the National Flood Insurers Association, alleging that their property in Raritan, New Jersey, damaged by flooding, was insured against this loss by the defendant but that the defendant has refused to pay their claim for damages. The defendant promptly removed the action to federal court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1441 and 1446 and now moves for an order pursuant to Rule 25(d), Fed.RCiv.P., substituting John W. Macy, Jr., Director of the Federal Emergency Management Agency, as the party…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Larson v. Domestic and Foreign Commerce Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Dugan v. RankSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Soriano v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Minnesota v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Lambert Run Coal Co. v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Joseph Sodowski v. National Flood Insurance Program of the Federal Emergency Management AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
- Sandia Oil Co. v. BecktonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989
- Reeder v. Nationwide Mutual Fire InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2006
- Kolner v. Director, Federal Emergency Management AgencyDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1982
- Re Van Holt, Jo Van Holt v. Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Company, Liberty Mutual GroupCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.