Legal Opinion

Chadwick v. Chadwick

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided February 6, 1884PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error to Van Buren. (Mills, J.) Appeal from allowance of claim against estate. Claimant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtSherwood, J.

The claimant and Evered E. Ghadwick named in this case were brothers, and previous to the decease of the latter, for several years prior to April 4, 1879, carried on business together as copartners at Decatur in this State. At that date the copartnership was dissolved, a settlement had, anda division of most of the property made between them. A third brother, Theodore, assisted and arranged the settlement, which was finally concluded between the parties, and made the division of the property for them, and both' the settlement and division of the property was reduced to writing at the time by…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Downey v. AndrusMichigan Supreme Court · 1880

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Socha v. PassinoMichigan Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Silverstone v. London Assurance Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Vasquez v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1907
  4. In Re Einfeldt's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Moody v. Pulte Homes, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API