Legal Opinion

State v. Stephenson

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided December 19, 1997No. 19283-7-IIPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSeinfeld, J.

David Stephenson appeals two convictions for second degree theft. Among other claims, he argues that he was denied the right to a unanimous jury because the elements instructions charged alternative offenses, hut the court did not provide a unanimity instruction. We agree and, thus, reverse.

FACTS

Stephenson began working as a mortgage broker in late 1990. He used the name Statewide Financial Services and, on his stationary, referred to his business as a corporation. He also referred to his “home office,” thereby suggesting multiple branches. But he actually ran a one-person unincorporated…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. PetrichWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  2. State v. KitchenWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  3. State v. Ortega-MartinezWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  4. State v. StephensWashington Supreme Court · 1980
  5. State v. JoyWashington Supreme Court · 1993

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. LinehanWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  2. State v. LinehanWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  3. State v. PerezCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005
  4. State v. PerezCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API