Reebok International Ltd. v. Su Youn Pak
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GRIESA, District Judge.
The above caption is from the current complaint — the first amended complaint. The defendants include Urico Trading Corp. and defendants Oh, Unsung Ree and Yungja Ree, who are connected with Urico. The four Urico defendants are represented by the law firm of Altschul & Altschul, who stipulated to the “entry” of the first amended complaint.
Altschul & Altschul have filed, on behalf of the Urico defendants, an answer which contains five affirmative defenses and fourteen counterclaims. The numbering of the counterclaims in the answer only goes to thirteen, but there…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Time Warner Entertainment Co. v. DOES NOS. 1-2District Court, E.D. New York · 1994
- Gucci America, Inc. v. AccentsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1997
- Nba Properties v. Various John Does and Jane Does, and Abc CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
- United States v. ShayotaDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2016