State v. Nesbit
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtFlynn, J.
Defendant appeals from a judgment imposing enhanced sentences for two of three counts of aggravated theft in the first degree, ORS 164.057, following his plea of no contest to an indictment charging three counts of aggravated theft in the first degree. The trial court sentenced defendant to probation on Count 1 and then counted the conviction on Count 1 as a previous conviction to support the enhanced sentences on Counts 2 and 3. See ORS 137.717(l)(a)(A) (2009).1 We conclude that the state failed to meet its burden to prove that the three counts of aggravated theft arose out of separate…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. BoydOregon Supreme Court · 1975
- State v. FitzgeraldOregon Supreme Court · 1973
- Barrett v. BellequeOregon Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. WitherspoonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
- State v. PotterCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. DulfuCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
- State v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2022
- State v. DentCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2023
- State v. SpynuMultnomah County Circuit Court, Oregon · 2016
- State v. CrookCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2024