Legal Opinion

Murray v. Pate

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided May 1, 1838PublishedCited by 8 opinions

From the Circuit Court for Breckinridge County. Assumpsit. Statement of the case.

1Opinion of the Court

Judge Marshall

delivered the'Opinion-of the Court.

This action of assumsit was brought by ' Pate against Murray, to recover five hundred dollars alleged to have been received by the defendant, from a certain John O. Tunstall, for the use of the plaintiff, and to be paid to him when he should make and deliver to the defendant, a deed conveying a certain tract of land >to said Tun-stall; and the plaintiff avers that he did make and tender the deed to the defendant, but the latter refused and still refuses to pay the said five hundred dollars.

The defendant demurred to the declaration, and pleaded…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Hayes v. Massachusetts Mutual Life InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Usher's Ex'r v. FloodCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1886
  3. City of Murray v. CrawfordCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1910
  4. Curnutt v. RobertsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1850
  5. Louisville Trust Co. v. National Bank of KentuckyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1939

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API