Legal Opinion

Beauley v. Beauley

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 23, 1921PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal by the plaintiff, William J. Beauley, from an order of the Supreme Court, made at the New York Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of New York on the 28th day of November, 1921, denying plaintiff’s motion for leave to amend the complaint herein.

1Per curiam

We are of opinion that this complaint should be amended. It is unnecessary to review the case as explaining our conclusion. There are two causes of action, however, in the proposed amended complaint which the plaintiff will not be allowed to assert. The second cause of action is for a divorce by reason of improper relations with one Swami Abhedananda. *281From the record in our court, however, it appears that this happened ten years ago, and upon the motion for alimony when this case was before tried it appeared that the plaintiff had full knowledge of the facts upon which his cause of action was…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Faas v. FaasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of ChandlerNew York Surrogate's Court · 1941
  2. Beauley v. BeauleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1921

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API