Legal Opinion
Bernard v. United Township High School District No. 30
District Court, C.D. Illinois
Decided September 28, 1992No. 91-4099PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
MIHM, Chief Judge.
Before the court is the Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss. For the reasons set forth below, this motion is GRANTED.
BACKGROUND
The Plaintiff, Jason Bernard, filed a two count complaint for money damages on December 12, 1991. Count I was brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging that the Defendant, United Township High School District, violated the Plaintiff’s First and Fourteenth Amendment rights to draw and market prints of a public building. Count II presents a pendant state law tort claim for the intentional interference with prospective business advantage. ■ The…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Perry v. SindermannSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Jason Bernard v. United Township High School District Number 30Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993