Legal Opinion

Jones v. State

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided June 7, 2002No. 293, 2000PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VEASEY, Chief Justice:

In this case we consider whether the trial court properly admitted a murder victim’s hearsay statements regarding her intent to end her relationship with the defendant and her belief that the relationship was over and, if so, whether the trial court was required to issue an accompanying limiting instruction. We reaffirm that a homicide victim’s hearsay statements are admissible under D.R.E. 803(8) 1 if they express the victim’s then existing state of mind or intended future conduct 2 and are relevant to proving the defendant’s motive to kill. Because the statements in…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Mutual Life Insurance v. HillmonSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Shepard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  3. Wainwright v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1986
  4. Flamer v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1984
  5. Desmond v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1994

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. People v. RiccardiCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Ortiz v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2005
  3. McAllister v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2002
  4. Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2009
  5. Wright v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2008

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API