Legal Opinion
D & M Contractors, Inc. v. Forlano
Superior Court of Delaware
Decided October 20, 1971PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STIFTEL, President Judge.
It is difficult from the record to follow the procedural sequence in this case. Apparently, Humberto Forlano petitioned for commutation (19 Del.C. § 2358) of payments due in the future under section 2324. There was a hearing thereunder and the Board granted commutation of all payments due under section 2324 for the life expectancy of the claimant. There was a motion for reargument by the employer and at the same time it moved for commutation of permanent partial disability payments under 19 Del.C. § 2326, in which petition the claimant joined.
The Board approved a…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- M. A. Hartnett, Inc. v. ColemanSupreme Court of Delaware · 1967
- Ernest Di Sabatino & Sons, Inc. v. ApostolicoSupreme Court of Delaware · 1970
- Federal Bake Shops, Inc. v. MacZynskiSuperior Court of Delaware · 1962
- Berryman v. John F. Casey CompanySuperior Court of Delaware · 1969
- Molitor v. WilderSuperior Court of Delaware · 1963
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Thomas v. Custer State HospitalSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
- Thomas v. Custer State HospitalSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994