Legal Opinion

Ernest Di Sabatino & Sons, Inc. v. Apostolico

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided September 17, 1970PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAREY, Justice:

This is a workmen’s compensation case. The appellant, Ernest Di Sabatino & Sons, Inc., is the employer of the appellee, Thomas Apostólico, Jr. The question presented is whether or not an employee is entitled to receive workmen’s compensation benefits under both T. 19 Del.C. § 2325, for partial disability for work, and § 2326, for certain scheduled permanent injuries. We answered this question in the affirmative in Alloy Surfaces Company v. Cicamore, Del.Supr., 221 A.2d 480 (1966), and we adhere to that decision.

The appellee was injured in the course of his employment as a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Alloy Surfaces Company v. CicamoreSupreme Court of Delaware · 1966
  2. Ernest DiSabatino & Sons, Inc. v. ApostolicoSuperior Court of Delaware · 1969
  3. General Motors Corp. v. VaccariniSupreme Court of Delaware · 1953

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Keys v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1975
  2. Albert E. DAVIDSON, Plaintiff, Appellee, v. Louis W. SULLIVAN, M.D., Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant, AppellantCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
  3. Asplundh Tree Expert Co. v. ClarkSuperior Court of Delaware · 1975
  4. Sturgill v. M & M, INC.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1974
  5. Diamond Fuel Oil v. O'NEALSupreme Court of Delaware · 1999

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API