Legal Opinion
Swift County Bank v. United Farmers Elevators
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided April 16, 1985No. C3-84-1586PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LANSING, Judge.
Respondent Swift County Bank sued appellant United Farmers Grain Elevators (United) for conversion of grain. United purchased the grain, in which the bank had a valid, perfected security interest, from a farmer who was joined as a third-party defendant. The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of the bank against United and in favor of United against the farmer. United appeals the summary judgment. We affirm.
FACTS
Swift County Bank held a valid security interest in all grain sold during 1983 by Roger Berens, a farmer who was indebted to the bank for at least…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Rodgers v. Bankers National BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
- Cobb v. Midwest Recovery Bureau Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- Wabasso State Bank v. Caldwell Packing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- State v. Northwestern National Bank of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
- Gale v. LeeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
3Cited by8 opinions
- Halla v. Norwest Bank Minnesota, N.A.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1999
- Erlandson Implement, Inc. v. First State Bank of BrownsdaleCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
- Kelley v. Associated Bank (In re Petters Co.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · 2016
- First National Bank of LeCenter v. Farmers Union Marketing & Processing Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
- Citizens National Bank of Madelia v. Mankato Implement, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.