Legal Opinion

Pringle v. Wolfe

New York Court of Appeals

Decided June 28, 1996PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Ciparick, J.

In an effort to reduce the incidence of drunk driving on New York’s roadways, the State Legislature enacted the prompt suspension law (Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1193 [2] [e] [7]), which under certain circumstances mandates the suspension of a driver’s license to operate a motor vehicle pending prosecution for driving while intoxicated. We hold that the prompt suspension law accords with due process requirements.

I

Background

To supplement the government’s arsenal in its war against drunk driving, the Legislature enacted Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1193 (2) (e) (7),…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Bell v. BursonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. MacKey v. MontrymSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Dixon v. LoveSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. People v. MertzNew York Court of Appeals · 1986

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Schmitt v. SkoviraAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  2. Dubin v. County of NassauDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2017
  3. People v. RoachAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  4. Schermerhorn v. BeckerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  5. Figel v. DwyerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API