Legal Opinion · Dissent

National Labor Relations Board v. Local 825,a,b,c,d, International Union of Operating Engineers

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided December 18, 1981No. 80-1334Published

1DissentRosenn, Circuit Judge

I respectfully dissent because I believe the Board proved, by clear and convincing evidence, a classic case of illegal secondary activity and deliberate violations of this court’s previous judgments and its purgation order of October 8, 1970. I have a definite and firm conviction that the Master *388was mistaken with respect to several critical findings of fact and that his conclusions of law run counter to firmly established principles governing secondary boycotts and common situs picketing. Accordingly, I would reject his recommendations and adjudicate Local 825 in further civil contempt and…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. National Labor Relations Board v. Denver Building & Construction Trades CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  2. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  3. Local 761, International Union of Electrical, Radio & MacHine Workers v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  4. National Labor Relations Board v. Local 825, International Union of Operating EngineersSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Brown Transport Corporation v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1964

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API