Legal Opinion

Dull v. Tellez

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided September 17, 1971No. 647PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HENDLEY, Judge.

Plaintiffs sued for damages arising out of a rear-end. automobile collision. The trial court submitted the issue of unavoidable accident because o.f an .unforeseeable sudden illness to the jury;,- The plaintiffs objected on the ground that .¡there was no evidence of a sudden illness and that by submitting this as the basis for an unavoidable accident instruction the trial, court submitted a false issue to the jury. , The jury returned a verdict for defendant and plaintiffs appeal asserting there •• was a lack of evidence to support giving ' instructions relating to…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Samora v. BradfordNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1970
  2. Rekart v. Safeway Stores, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1970
  3. Flanary v. Transport Trucking StopNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1968
  4. Ferran v. JacquezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Boyd v. ClevelandNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1970

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State v. SnedekerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1982
  2. State v. CaldwellNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2008
  3. State v. NiewiadowskiNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1995
  4. Aragon v. SpeelmanNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1971
  5. State v. PadillaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1994

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API