Dull v. Tellez
New Mexico Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HENDLEY, Judge.
Plaintiffs sued for damages arising out of a rear-end. automobile collision. The trial court submitted the issue of unavoidable accident because o.f an .unforeseeable sudden illness to the jury;,- The plaintiffs objected on the ground that .¡there was no evidence of a sudden illness and that by submitting this as the basis for an unavoidable accident instruction the trial, court submitted a false issue to the jury. , The jury returned a verdict for defendant and plaintiffs appeal asserting there •• was a lack of evidence to support giving ' instructions relating to…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Samora v. BradfordNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1970
- Rekart v. Safeway Stores, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1970
- Flanary v. Transport Trucking StopNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1968
- Ferran v. JacquezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1961
- Boyd v. ClevelandNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1970
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- State v. SnedekerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1982
- State v. CaldwellNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2008
- State v. NiewiadowskiNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1995
- Aragon v. SpeelmanNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1971
- State v. PadillaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1994
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.