Legal Opinion

Ross v. Common Pleas Court

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 28, 1972No. 72-45PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Per curiam

Habeas corpus is not available where it appears that the sentencing court had jurisdiction to render the judgment of conviction. Freeman v. Maxwell (1965), 4 Ohio St. 2d 4. In this case, petitioner makes no claim of lack of jurisdiction by the respondent court.

Moreover, petitioner does not allege that his guilty plea, entered while he was represented by counsel, was not voluntary. “A defendant who enters a voluntary plea of *324guilty while represented by competent counsel waives all nonjurisdictional defects in prior stages of the proceedings.” Crockett v. Haskins (1966), 372 F. 2d 475.

The…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Freeman v. MaxwellOhio Supreme Court · 1965
  2. George Crockett v. E. B. Haskins, Supt.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1966

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. State v. RogersOhio Supreme Court · 2015
  2. State v. SpatesOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  3. State v. FitzpatrickOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  4. State v. SpatesOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  5. State v. ChessmanOhio Court of Appeals · 2005

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API