Legal Opinion

E.M. v. Shady Grove Reproductive Science Center P.C.

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided May 7, 2019No. Civil Action No. 2019-0657Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA E.M., : : Plaintiff, : Civil Action No.: 19-657 (RC) : v. : Re Document No.: 5 : SHADY GROVE REPRODUCTIVE : SCIENCE CENTER P.C., : : Defendant. : MEMORANDUM OPINION DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION I. INTRODUCTION For years, Plaintiff E.M. used the services of Shady Grove Fertility (“SGF”) in an effort to conceive a biological child. But in early 2019, as E.M. was preparing to use six eggs that SGF had frozen for her years earlier, SGF dismissed her as a patient—a decision that E.M. alleges was made in retaliation…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
  2. Sampson v. MurraySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Weinberger v. Romero-BarceloSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Chaplaincy of Full Gospel Churches v. EnglandCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2006
  5. Sherley v. SebeliusCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2011

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API