Legal Opinion
Reinhart v. Birmingham, City of
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided September 28, 2022No. 2:22-cv-11074Unknown
1Opinion
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION JOHN REINHART, et al., Plaintiffs Case No. 22-11074 v. HON. MARK A. GOLDSMITH CITY OF BIRMINGHAM, Defendant. __________________________________/ OPINION & ORDER (1) DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS (Dkt. 16) AND (2) DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR A PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION (Dkt. 8) Two motions are before the Court: Plaintiffs’ motion for a preliminary injunction (Dkt. 8) and the City of Birmingham’s motion to dismiss (Dkt. 16). For the reasons set forth below, the Court denies both motions.1 I. BACKGROUND Plaintiffs John Reinhart, Anthony…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Lujan v. National Wildlife FederationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Taylor v. SturgellSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Directv, Inc. And Echostar Satellite L.L.C. v. Mark Treesh, Commissioner for the Department of Revenue for the State of KentuckyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.