Legal Opinion

Propst v. Stillman

California Supreme Court

Decided April 2, 1990No. S006951Published

1Opinion of the Court

50 Cal.3d 448 (1990)

788 P.2d 628

268 Cal. Rptr. 114

Estate of FLOYD D. PROPST, Deceased.

GRAPLE EULA PROPST, Petitioner and Respondent,

v.

NETA STILLMAN et al., Objectors and Appellants.

Docket No. S006951.

Supreme Court of California.

April 2, 1990.

COUNSEL

Anderson & Drossel and Norlen E. Drossel for Objectors and Appellants.

Watson, Hoffe & Barbieri, Francis A. Watson, Jr., Karen R. Barbieri and Dean E. Barbieri for Petitioner and Respondent.

OPINION

KENNARD, J.

The issue we consider in this case is whether a joint tenancy in personal property, such as a joint tenancy bank account, may be severed by the…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Foley v. Interactive Data Corp.California Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Great Northern Railway Co. v. Sunburst Oil & Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
  4. Nga Li v. Yellow Cab Co.California Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Moradi-Shalal v. Fireman's Fund Ins. CompaniesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API