Legal Opinion
Urciolo v. Washington
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided June 1, 1973No. 6478PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KELLY, Associate Judge:
On October 16, 1970, the Board for the Condemnation of Insanitary Buildings served on George L. Cates, appellants’ property manager, a notice to show cause why premises 1409 Columbia Street, N.W., should not be condemned because of its insanitary condition.1 The notice was served on Mr. Cates at SOI D Street, N.W., Joseph J. Urciolo’s place of business. When appellants failed to respond to the notice to show cause the Board served a condemnation order on Mr. Cates and posted a copy thereof on the property.2 Appellants failed to respond to the condemnation order but in…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Trinity Methodist Church v. Federal Radio CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1932
- Keyes v. MadsenCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1950
- Capital View Realty Co. v. MeigsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1952
- McHugh v. DuaneDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1947
3Cited by8 opinions
- Anne E. Miles v. District of Columbia, a Municipal Corporation, and John A. TaylorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1975
- Miller v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991
- Anne E. Miles v. District of Columbia, a Municipal Corporation, and John A. TaylorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1975
- Timus v. District of Columbia Department of Human RightsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
- Timus v. District of Columbia Department of Human RightsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.