Timus v. District of Columbia Department of Human Rights
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
633 A.2d 751 (1993)
Carrie J. TIMUS, Petitioner,
v.
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RIGHTS, Respondent.
William J. Davis, Inc., Intervenor.
No. 90-AA-465.
District of Columbia Court of Appeals.
Argued October 15, 1992.
Decided November 8, 1993.
Karen L. Barr, with whom Thomas P. Olson and John P. Relman, Washington, DC, were on the brief, for petitioner.
Edward E. Schwab, Asst. Corp. Counsel, with whom Herbert O. Reid, Sr., Corp. Counsel at the time the brief was filed, and Charles L. Reischel, Deputy Corp. Counsel, Washington, DC, were on the brief, for respondent.
Michael E. Brand,…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part · Ferren; Concurring in part, dissenting in part · Rogers; Dissent.
2Cases cited51 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Alexander v. Gardner-Denver Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Larson v. Domestic and Foreign Commerce Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Newman v. Piggie Park Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Land v. DollarSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.