Legal Opinion

McAlmond v. Bevington

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 24, 1900No. 3627PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, King County. — Hon. Orange Jacobs, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

*316The opinion of the court was delivered by

White, J.

On the 28th day of January, 1899, Henry McAlmond, the appellant, who was the plaintiff in the garnishee proceedings in the court below, recovered a judgment in the superior court of King county, in cause Ho. 26,125, — -Hugh Barbour, plaintiff, against E. H. McAlmond et al., defendants, — against Robert Bevington, who was one of the defendants in the action, in which judgment was recovered for the sum of $500, with interest, etc. The said judgment remained unsatisfied, and on the 21st day of September, 1899, the said Henry McAlmond filed in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People, Ex Rel. Gilbert v. . LaidlawNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
  2. Bellingham Bay Boom Co. v. BrisboisWashington Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Salter v. WeinerNew York Supreme Court · 1858
  4. Merwin v. FowlerWashington Supreme Court · 1899

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Beaston v. Portland Trust & Savings BankWashington Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Simmons v. BeesonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1926
  3. Kellogg v. WitteWashington Supreme Court · 1919
  4. State v. WilliamsWashington Supreme Court · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API