Legal Opinion

McDonald v. Standard Gas Engine Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 23, 1935No. Civ. 9457PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSturtevant, J.

For injuries sustained by the explosion of a pulley in an iron factory the plaintiff sued to recover damages. He named as defendants the Standard Gas Engine Company, hereinafter called the Gas Company, the owner of the plant; he also named Standard Diesel Engine Company, a lessee, hereinafter called the Diesel Company; and he also named Charles A. Winslow. The jury returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff and against all of the defendants. From that verdict the defendants have appealed. As each appellant stands on a different footing, it is necessary to consider the appeals separately.

Appe…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Gilliland v. BondurantSupreme Court of Missouri · 1933
  2. Aguilar v. Riverdale Cooperative Creamery Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  3. Lytle Creek Water Co. v. PerdewCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
  4. Marsh v. . HandNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  5. Sanders v. AustinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Mudrick v. Market Street Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Jones v. Pennsylvania Railroad Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1944
  3. Thompson v. RobbinsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1956
  4. Schwerdtfeger v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  5. Merritt v. NickelsonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1978

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API