Legal Opinion

Tiernan v. Tiernan

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided April 17, 1980PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

1. The judge did not commit an error of law in accepting the court-appointed investigator’s valuation of the corporate stock of the package store. See Assessors of Quincy v. Boston Consol. Gas Co., 309 Mass. 60, 72 (1941); Piemonte v. New Boston Garden Corp., 377 Mass. 719, 731-732 (1979); Whaler Motor Inn, Inc. v. Parsons, 3 Mass. App. Ct. 662, 675-676 (1975), S.C., 372 Mass. 620 (1977), S.C., sub nom. Whaler Motor Inn, Inc. v. Freedman, ante 884 (1980). The judge’s finding of the fair market value of the marital home was supported by evi*902dence and cannot be pronounced “clearly erroneous”…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Rice v. RiceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
  2. Assessors of Quincy v. Boston Consolidated Gas Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
  3. First National Bank of Boston v. BrinkMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
  4. Bianco v. BiancoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
  5. Putnam v. PutnamMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1977

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. HannafordMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1980
  2. Zeller v. American Safety Razor Corp.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1983
  3. Dobson v. DobsonMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API