Legal Opinion

Belgravia Hartford Capital, Inc. and Belgravia Hartford Gold Assets Corp. v. Stinson, LLP, Paul Lackey, Esq., and Snell & Wilmer L.L.P.

District Court, D. New Mexico

Decided October 14, 2025No. 1:25-cv-00119Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO BELGRAVIA HARTFORD CAPITAL, INC., and BELGRAVIA HARTFORD GOLD ASSETS CORP., Plaintiffs, v. No. 1:25-cv-00119-JCH-KK STINSON, LLP, PAUL LACKEY, ESQ., and SNELL & WILMER L.L.P., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER On February 7, 2025, Defendants Stinson, LLP (“Stinson”) and Paul Lackey (“Lackey”) (collectively, the “Stinson Defendants”) filed a Motion to Compel Arbitration and Stay Proceedings (Dkt. No. 3). The Stinson Defendants contend that Plaintiffs signed a written engagement agreement with them that contained a valid…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Atlantic Marine Constr. Co. v. United States Dist. Court for Western Dist. of Tex.Supreme Court of the United States · 2013
  4. Gilmer v. Interstate/Johnson Lane Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. Stolt-Nielsen S. A. v. AnimalFeeds International Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2010

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API