Legal Opinion

Ford Motor Co. v. Linnane

Montana Supreme Court

Decided May 9, 1936No. 7,519PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

It is apparent that the trial court took the view that only property in the state and subject to its jurisdiction at noon on the first Monday of March is taxable for that fiscal year, and did so upon the authority of the case of Hayes v. Smith,58 Mont. 306, 192 P. 615. That case involved the constitutionality of an Act providing for the assessment and taxation of livestock brought into this state for the purpose of grazing. The holding of the court was that the Act was unconstitutional because it violated the rule of uniformity declared by our state Constitution. Accordingly, it is apparent…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Coe v. ErrolSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Farmers Loan & Trust Co. v. MinnesotaSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  3. Bacon v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  4. Southern Pacific Co. v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  5. Hilger v. MooreMontana Supreme Court · 1919

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Wheir v. DyeMontana Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Swartz v. BergMontana Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Christofferson v. Chouteau CountyMontana Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Yellowstone Bank v. State Board of EqualizationMontana Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Sutter v. ScudderMontana Supreme Court · 1940

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API