Legal Opinion

State v. Barton

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided November 6, 1997No. 95-753PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THAYER,

j. a jury convicted the defendant, John Barton, of attempted burglary. See RSA 635:1 (1996). The defendant appeals his conviction, asserting that the Superior Court {Lynn, J.) impermissibly amended the underlying indictment by instructing the jury regarding accomplice liability. See RSA 626:8, 111(a) (1996). We affirm.

The underlying indictment sufficiently charged the defendant as a principal to an attempted burglary. At the conclusion of the State’s case-in-chief, the defendant moved to dismiss. The trial court denied the motion, reasoning that even if the defendant did not perform…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. United States v. Rigoberto Moya-Gomez Celestino Orlando Estevez Amado Raphael Leon Adalberto Herrera and Menelao Orlando EstevezCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
  2. United States v. Ralph Kelly Taylor, IICourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
  3. United States v. Edwin Sanchez, United States of America v. Gregorio Rosario, United States of America v. Rafael SanchezCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
  4. United States v. ForsytheCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
  5. United States v. Charles E. Lester and Edward Anthony BuccieriCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1966

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. DuranSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2008
  2. State v. MarshallSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2011
  3. State v. FrenchSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2001
  4. State v. EndersonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2002
  5. State v. WinwardSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2011

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API