Legal Opinion
Pettit v. Smith
District Court, D. Arizona
Decided September 9, 2014No. CV-11-02139-PHX-DGCPublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
DAVID G. CAMPBELL, District Judge.
Plaintiff Ron Zachary Pettit filed a motion for spoliation sanctions in January 2014. Doc. 163. The Court held a hearing on March 26, 2014, at which it heard oral argument on Plaintiffs motion. Doc. 195. Based on the argument, the Court allowed Plaintiff to conduct additional discovery and file a renewed motion for sanctions. Id. Plaintiff has now filed the renewed motion against Defendants Torrey Smith, Scott Mueller, Jose Luque, and Amy Morrow. Doc. 219. The motion is fully briefed and the Court heard oral argument on August 13, 2014. For the reasons…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Roadway Express, Inc. v. PiperSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Cion Peralta v. T. DillardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Mauricio A. Leon, M.D. v. Idx Systems Corporation, a Vermont Corporation, Mauricio A. Leon, M.D. v. Idx Systems Corporation, a Vermont CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Mark N. Silvestri v. General Motors Corporation, Dfendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2001
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Zbylski v. Douglas County School DistrictDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2015
- Peters v. CoxDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2018
- (PC) Cotton v. MedinaDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2025
- (PC) Peyton v. KiblerDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
- (PC) Rodriguez v. KnightDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.