Summers v. Summers
West Virginia Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
WORKMAN, Justice:
Issues raised in this consolidated appeal include the enforceability of an unsigned post-decree property settlement agreement and the existence of jurisdiction to modify a divorce decree in view of this Court’s decision in Segal v. Beard, 181 W.Va. 92, 380 S.E.2d 444 (1989), wherein we ruled that family law masters and circuit judges are without jurisdiction to hear modifica tion petitions which lack issues of spousal or child support, custody, or visitation. For the reasons set forth below, we conclude that a Segal v. Beard jurisdiction problem was not present here and that…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Somerville v. SomervilleWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1988
- In Re Estate of HerefordWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1978
- Segal v. BeardWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1989
- Masse v. MasseSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1974
- Gangopadhyay v. GangopadhyayWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1991
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Haynes v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.West Virginia Supreme Court · 2011
- Summers v. SummersWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1995
- Squirts v. SquirtsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1997
- Hager v. HagerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1993
- Haynes v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.West Virginia Supreme Court · 2011
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.