Legal Opinion

People v. Pearson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 28, 2012Published

1Opinion of the Court

— Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated November 16, 2010 (People v Pearson, 78 AD3d 968 [2010]), affirming a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered April 11, 2006, as amended May 31, 2006.

Ordered that the application is denied.

The appellant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel (see Jones v Barnes, 463 US 745 [1983]; People v Stultz, 2 NY3d 277 [2004]). Rivera, J.E, Angiolillo, Roman and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Jones v. BarnesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. People v. StultzNew York Court of Appeals · 2004
  3. People v. PearsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API