Dietz v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)
1Opinion of the Court
BEA ANN SMITH, Justice.
Mark Dietz appeals his conviction for impersonating a public servant, see Tex. Pen.Code Ann. § 37.11 (West Supp.2001), for which he was sentenced to two years’ probation. He complains on appeal that there is a fatal variance between the indictment and the proof at trial, and that the State introduced false evidence. We will overrule both issues and affirm the judgment of the trial court.
FACTUAL BACKGROUND
The Impersonation Incident
In the early morning of June 19, 1999, bail enforcement agent Mark Dietz attempted to apprehend Nabor Rangel, who had failed to appear on a…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Malik v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
- Mooney v. HolohanSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Gollihar v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2001
- United States v. SprickCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Ex Parte NiswangerCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2011
- Cornwell, Robert WilliamCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2015
- Ex Parte NiswangerCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2011
- Jeffrey Scott Swan v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2006
- Jeffrey Scott Swan v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2006
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.