Legal Opinion

Shrader v. Employers Mut. Cas. Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided February 25, 2005No. 1020110PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit has certified to this Court, pursuant to Ala. R.App. P. 18, the following question:

"Does an insurance policy provision limiting an `insured' to an employee acting `within the scope of duties' while conducting the business of the employer conflict with a separate provision in the same insurance policy providing coverage for `violations of constitutional/civil rights' so as to create an ambiguity that must be construed against the insurer?"

Employers Mut. Cas. Co. v. Mallard, 309 F.3d 1305, 1311 (11th Cir. 2002). We answer this question…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Screws v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Andrew Wilson v. City of Chicago, Cross-Claim and Jon Burge, Cross-ClaimCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
  3. George C. Hibma v. Richard T. Odegaard, James Nikodem, and Michael Paul Szula, and Sawyer County, Wisconsin, InterveningCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
  4. PURRELL v. State Farm Fire and Cas. Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
  5. Bailer v. Erie Insurance ExchangeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1997

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Twin City Fire Insurance v. Ohio Casualty InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2007
  2. Amin v. Mercedes-Benz United States, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2018
  3. Baldwin Mutual Insurance Company v. Melissa AdairSupreme Court of Alabama · 2014
  4. Ala. Mun. Ins. Corp. v. Scottsdale Ins. Co.District Court, N.D. Alabama · 2017
  5. Hillery v. Allstate Indemnity Co.District Court, S.D. Alabama · 2010

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API