Hamilton v. Park & McKay Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Wayne; Carpenter, J. Assumpsit by John H. Hamilton against the Park & McKay Company to recover royalties under a contract for the manufacture and sale of a certain device. From a judgment for defendant on verdict directed by the court, plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.
This case has been here once before, and is reported in 112 Mich. 138 (70 N. W. 436). A reference to the case as reported will aid in the understanding of the case as now presented. A fuller statement of the condition of the pleadings is necessary to a proper understanding of the case. It was averred in the declaration that the water-closet was modeled and ready to be put in the market October 31, 1892, and that defendant has put it in *73use and sold it in the market from that time up to and including the commencement of the suit. A demand was made for a bill of particulars. The bill of…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Gayler v. WilderSupreme Court of the United States · 1851
- Marston v. . SwettNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
- Marston v. . SwettNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
- Burton v. Burton Stock Car Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1898
- Harlow v. PutnamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1878
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Free-Flow Muffler Company v. KliewerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1955
- Sunday v. Novi Equipment Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1939
- Free-Flow Muffler Company v. KliewerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1955