Legal Opinion

Boykin v. Martocello

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided November 12, 1942No. 14269PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Bell, Presiding Justice.

The constitution (Code, § 2-3902) declares that “It shall be the duty of the solicitor-general to represent the State in all cases in the superior courts of his circuit and in all cases taken up from his circuit to the Supreme Court; and to perform such other services as shall be required of him by law.” The plaintiff relies in part on the first clause of this provision, contending that it includes divorce cases. We can not sustain this contention. According to the usual and ordinary signification of the language employed, this clause applies only to cases in which the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Watts v. WattsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1908
  2. Jones v. JonesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1936
  3. Park v. CandlerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
  4. Haygood v. HaygoodSupreme Court of Georgia · 1940
  5. Leland v. LelandIllinois Supreme Court · 1925

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Fortson v. FortsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1943
  2. Malcom v. WebbSupreme Court of Georgia · 1955
  3. Griffin v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1943
  4. Brackett v. BrackettSupreme Court of Georgia · 1961
  5. Cohen v. CohenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1953

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API