Malcom v. Webb
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Hawkins, Justice.
(After stating the foregoing facts.) The plaintiff, Paul Webb, in his official capacity as Solicitor-General of the Atlanta Judicial Circuit, was not authorized to maintain the present suit. The solicitor-general’s duties, insofar as civil litigation is concerned, are defined by statutes, Code §§ 24-2908 (5, 9, 10) and 72-202, which authorize him to prosecute or defend any civil action in which the State is interested, unless otherwise specially provided for; and he may collect by rule, order of court, or other legal means, all money due the State in the hands of any…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Meinhard v. SalmonNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Sumner v. SumnerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1938
- Peacock v. HorneSupreme Court of Georgia · 1925
- Heilig Bros. Co., Inc. v. KohlerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. ClarkeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. PinyanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
- City of Atlanta v. BlackSupreme Court of Georgia · 1995
- West v. Fulton CountySupreme Court of Georgia · 1997
- Timbs v. StraubSupreme Court of Georgia · 1960
- State Highway Department v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1969
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.