Legal Opinion

Fiorella v. City of Birmingham

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided May 9, 1950No. 6 Div. 825Published

1Opinion of the Court

48 So.2d 761 (1950)

FIORELLA

v.

CITY OF BIRMINGHAM.

6 Div. 825.

Court of Appeals of Alabama.

May 9, 1950.

Rehearing Denied June 20, 1950.

Gibson & Hewitt, of Birmingham, for appellant.

Chas. H. Brown, Asst. City Atty., of Birmingham, for appellee.

HARWOOD, Judge.

This appellant stands convicted of violating an ordinance of the City of Birmingham pertaining to policy games.

The complaint filed against the appellant in the circuit court, omitting the formal parts, charges that appellant, "within twelve months before the beginning of this prosecution, and within the City of Birmingham or the police…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. United States v. BalintSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  2. Arant v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
  3. Fiorella v. City of BirminghamAlabama Court of Appeals · 1950
  4. Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931
  5. Ford v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1897

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API