Legal Opinion
Euclid Chemical Co. v. Vector Corrosion Technologies, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided April 1, 2009No. 2008-1170Published
1Opinion of the Court
561 F.3d 1340 (2009)
The EUCLID CHEMICAL COMPANY, Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant-Appellant,
v.
VECTOR CORROSION TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Defendant-Appellee, and
David Whitmore, Defendant/Counterclaimant-Appellee, and
Vector Corrosion Technologies, Ltd., Counterclaimant-Appellee.
No. 2008-1170.
United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.
April 1, 2009.
Thomas H. Shunk, Baker & Hostetler LLP, of Cleveland, OH, argued for plaintiff/counterclaim defendant-appellant. With him on the brief was Jude A. Fry, Fay Sharpe LLP, of Cleveland, OH.
Brewster B. Taylor, Stites & Harbison, PLLC, of Alexandria, VA,…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Westfield Insurance v. GalatisOhio Supreme Court · 2003
- Tung-Hsiung Wu (Sean Tung-Xiung Wu) v. T.W. Wang, Inc. D/B/A World Journal USACourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
- Graham v. Drydock Coal Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1996
- Mars, Inc. v. Coin Acceptors, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.