Legal Opinion

McGlynn v. Scott

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided February 19, 1894PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Dickey County; Lauder, J. Action on a promissory note by William C. McGlynn against D. B. Scott. Plaintiff had judgment, and defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtCorliss, J.

The plaintiff having recovered judgment against the defendant upon a promissory noté, the defendant appeals. The judgment is based upon a verdict which the court directed the jury to find in favor of the plaintiff. One of the defenses to the note relied upon in the trial court was want of consideration. It is the only defense which merits our attention. The facts of this controversy are few and simple. Plaintiff and a man named Densmore were co-partners in the business of selling farm machinery. Some time in the month of August, 1890, a Mr. Thompson purchased a separator of the plaintiff…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Fire Ins. Assn., Ltd. v. WickhamSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. White v. . HoytNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
  3. Vanderbilt v. . SchreyerNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
  4. Wahl v. . BarnumNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  5. Kercheval v. DotyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1872

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Silander v. GronnaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Swan v. Great Northern Railway Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Butson v. MiszOregon Supreme Court · 1916
  4. State Ex Rel. v. YoungWyoming Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Snowball v. SnowballCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API