Northrop Grumman Corp. v. County of Los Angeles
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BOREN, P. J.
The County of Los Angeles assessed ad valorem property taxes on personal property allocated by a military defense contractor to the performance of its fixed-price contracts with the United States government. The progress payment clause of the federal contracts states that title to property allocable or chargeable to the contracts vests in the federal government. The county interprets this to mean that the United States takes a lien or security interest in the contractor’s property. We disagree with the county’s interpretation. Title means title. Title does not mean lien.…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- M'culloch v. State of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
- Clearfield Trust Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- United States v. County of AlleghenySupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Crocker National Bank v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
- Strayhorn v. Raytheon E-Systems, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2003
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Raytheon Co. v. Commissioner of RevenueMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2009
- County of Los Angeles v. Raytheon Co.California Court of Appeal · 2008