Legal Opinion

Montoya v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided September 20, 1995No. 1555-92PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON APPELLANTS PETITION FOB DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

MALONEY, Judge.

A jury convicted Appellant of aggravated sexual assault and assessed punishment at confinement for ninety-nine years. The Court of Appeals affirmed the conviction. Montoya v. State, 841 S.W.2d 419 (Tex.App.-Dallas 1992). We granted Appellant’s petition for discretionary review to determine whether the Court of Appeals erred in its treatment of Appellant’s contention that the evidence was insufficient.

Before trial, the State moved to amend the indictment to allege the complainant’s first name was “Lora” instead of “Lisa.”…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ward v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
  2. Fisher v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1994
  3. Montoya v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1993

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Rojas v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1998
  2. Mallet v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2000
  3. Jiminez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1997
  4. Robert Saldana, Jr. v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2013
  5. Williams v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)1997

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API